Bright pupils ‘sit GCSEs too early’ warns Ofsted

Sir Michael Wilshaw, Ofsted chief inspector, has warned that the watchdog will be “critical” of schools which use early entry for GCSE where they are not “absolutely confident” that pupils will be awarded an A* or A grade.

His message comes after Ofsted statistics showed an “explosion” in early entries for maths and English at GCSE over the past six years with around a third of all pupils – more than 200,000 in each subject – now entered early for these exams.

But figures released by Ofsted have shown that for pupils who were the highest achievers at primary school – reaching level 5 in Sats exams – 12 per cent fewer were awarded A grades in English and 11 per cent fewer got A grades in maths in 2011 where they took the GCSE exam early, compared to those who were not entered early.

“We think early entry hurts the chances of the most able children getting the top grades of A*, A and B which they need to progress to A level and certainly to university,” Sir Michael said.

Sir Michael added that even when pupils achieved those top grades early, Ofsted expected them to continue studying the core subjects of English, maths and science into Year 11 rather than being diverted to other subjects.

He said around one in five, or 20 per cent of children, who leave primary school with level 5 do not achieve the top grades at GCSE of A*, A and B as a result of a “combination” of factors including early entry at GCSE.

‘Curse of mixed ability classes’

Other factors included low expectations in schools of pupils, a failure to track the progress of pupils sufficiently and what Sir Michael termed “the curse of mixed ability classes without mixed ability teaching.”

“This is not a judgment on mixed ability as opposed to setting or streaming, it is saying where there are mixed ability classes unless there is differentiated teaching to groups of school children in the class, unless there are individual programmes of work, it doesn’t work,” he said,

He added: “It is absolutely critical that if you have a youngster with low grades at school who struggles with literacy and numeracy sitting alongside a youngster with Oxbridge potential then it is really important that is taken into account and they are taught by people who are experienced in good teaching of mixed ability classes.”

Sir Michael’s remarks were made as Ofsted unveiled the report “Getting to Good” examining the steps taken by headteachers in schools that have improved from satisfactory to good or better.

A second report on the impact of early entry for GCSE is due to be published at a later date by Ofsted.

Ofsted has warned schools that from start of this academic year, “good” is the minimum standard that will be expected of them, with the “satisfactory” rating used by inspectors scrapped in favour of “requires improvement.”

Sir Michael said leadership was the “key issue” in improving schools.

“If we are going to be a country which is competitive economically and competitive with the rest of the world and a country which is socially cohesive we have got to have more schools getting to good and particularly those schools in poorer areas,” he said.

The Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL) has told Channel 4 News “a large group of local authorities and colleges are getting ready to mount a legal challenge against the Ofqual decision to deny re-marking of GCSE English papers.”

More criticism

The claims are the latest criticism for the GCSE exams, after exams watchdog Ofqual refused to remark English papers over claims marks had been deliberately suppressed by examination boards.

More than 2,300 Welsh pupils were given improved GCSE English language scores by Cardiff-based exam board WJEC after a re-grading process. WJEC was issued a legal direction by Welsh Education Minister Mr Andrews to regrade candidates on the C-D grade boundary after acknowledging a problem with the scores.