Minimum wage upgrade does not offset benefit cuts
The Institute for Fiscal Studies finds it is undoubtedly the case that tax credit recipients in work will on average be worse off as a result of the budget changes
Damian Hinds made three claims about schools funding in parliament on Monday. Two of them are wrong, according to independent experts.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies finds it is undoubtedly the case that tax credit recipients in work will on average be worse off as a result of the budget changes
The IFS has scathing words for all the biggest parties as it accuses them of not being straight with voters over spending plans.
Ed Miliband kicked off the first day of the election campaign by launching Labour’s business manifesto, while David Cameron laid into the opposition leader on the doorstep of No.10.
Labour says people are £1,600 worse off under the coalition. George Osborne says we will be £900 better off. Who’s right?
Have living standards really bounced back to their pre-crash levels? Or are we losing thousands of pounds a year, as Ed Miliband says?
Are you out of pocket thanks to coalition policies? And would it have been any different under a Labour government?
Went to a state school? Then you can expect to earn thousands less than a privately-educated colleague with the same qualifications.
The Conservative government responds to Labour claims that wages have fallen in real terms under David Cameron – FactCheck explores which party is right.
Is the Prime Minister right that 24 million people will be better off by £6.50 thanks to the change in personal tax allowance thresholds? FactCheck begs to differ.
Faisal Islam blogs on the difficulties the coalition government faces with tackling poverty.
A round-up of three of the claims the Chancellor made that the Institute for Fiscal Studies takes issue with.
‘Clearly regressive’ are two words that will be sending shivers down the spines of the Coalition ministers. For the first time the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) has completed a comprehensive analysis of who will pay for the Budget measures announced in June, known as a distributional analysis in the jargon.
“Somewhat regressive” were the words that the coalition, particularly the yellow half, really would not have wanted to hear from the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), writes economics editor Faisal Islam.
So there we have it. Clarity, honesty, and candour on Day 22 of the election campaign. Not at any of the party political press conferences. No, it’s been left to the trusty holders of the spending shield of truth: the Institute for Fiscal Studies.