RBS: what now for the troubled bank?
Many would see today’s headlines and sigh. RBS forced to put aside another £400 million in compensation for past bad behaviour.
Oops, they did it again. Another multi-billion pound loss, for the ninth year in a row. In fact, the Royal Bank of Scotland lost £7 billion last year, more than three times the amount they lost in 2015.
Many would see today’s headlines and sigh. RBS forced to put aside another £400 million in compensation for past bad behaviour.
RBS has made a public apology and offered up to 400 million pounds in compensation over the way it treated many of its small business customers.
You could argue that it’s us the taxpayer – the people who bailed out RBS in the first place – that should have been given first dibs to buy the shares.
The government has sold a 5.2 per cent stake in RBS for 330p a share – £2.1bn. But was it a billion pound loss or an astute financial decision in an uncertain market?
Ministers say the taxpayer will end up making a profit after bailing out the banks to the tune of £100bn. But are they telling us the whole story?
So George Osborne could sit there and continue to take the flak every time something goes wrong…
RBS today announced a £3.5bn loss for 2014 – the bank’s seventh straight year of losses. So is it right that CEO Ross McEwan should take home an overall package of about £2.6m?
First it was Libor. Now Britain’s biggest banks are poised to disclose massive fines for their role in the manipulation of the global foreign exchange market, or Forex.
Ross McEwan missed an opportunity to do something bold on Thursday. For starters, here’s a good way to restore trust in Britain’s most mistrusted bank.
The taxpayer was hit with yet more bad news today, and the prospect of us ever exiting the RBS bank and getting our money back looks as far away as ever.
As Britain’s banks “pad up” their capital ratios, Economics Editor explores if RBS, bailed out by the taxpayer, should be able to use its losses to not pay tax?
Leaks from the banking commission’s report into the majority state-owned RBS show that a clear split is emerging – not with regard to RBS, but inside the commission itself.
It’s a simple threat from the SNP: if an independent Scotland can’t keep the UK’s currency, it doesn’t have to take on the country’s debts. But is there any legal basis for this?
In advocating that RBS should be split into good and bad banks, Sir Mervyn King is showing a “major display of independence in his last months in office”.